Astronomical causes of chronological shifts

Научный форум официального сайта проекта "Новая Хронология".
На НАУЧНОМ ФОРУМЕ обсуждаются вопросы, связанные только с хронологией и реконструкцией истории.
Правила форума
Разрешено обсуждение только НАУЧНЫХ вопросов, связанных с хронологией и реконструкцией истории.
Ответить

cjbaiget

Astronomical causes of chronological shifts

#1

Сообщение cjbaiget »

Dear friends,

I have just completed a series of astronomical calculations that allow us to find out the cause of the chronological jumps detected by New Chronology.

The results are summarized in the following points:

1 . The chronological jumps detected by New Chronology are of three types: planetary, stellar and lunisolar . They can also be of two variants: derived and not derived from the Gregorian Reform. Chronological manipulation was carried out at the end of the 16th century with a system based mainly on periodic recurrences of astronomical positions. This system provided a plausible second ancient dating for any existing astronomical record (horoscopes, stellar catalogs, religious celebrations, etc.)

2 . The main chronological jump of 1151 years (420403 Julian days) is planetary , and the one used to move the AD from the year 1152 to the year 1. It used the planetary synchronism that I discovered in October 2023. The planets remain synchronized in their movements throughout over the centuries with an average discrepancy of 20º, which remains stable. Since this synchronism is the main one, it is what forced the Gregorian Reform to occur, based on a supposed 10º shift at the equinox, for chronological alteration. More information in my blog.

3 . The secondary chronological jump of 720 years (262980 Julian days) is stellar. Although the 1151-year cycle caused the Gregorian Reform, this in turn generates the chronological jump of 720 years. It occurs when the ecliptic longitudes of the stars in the stellar catalogs are 'corrected' by 10º, based on the impositions of the reform. This is precisely what happened with the Almagest as demonstrated by its scc-md dating. Since the axial precession is 72 years per degree, a displacement of 10º implies a time span of 720 years. This jump affects the dynastic parallelism between the Holy Roman Empire (SS X-XIII) and the Third Roman Empire (SS IV-VI) (CHRON1, fig 6.19 p.274). More information in my blog.

4 . The secondary chronological jump of 1050 years (383513 Julian days) is lunisolar. Due to its power, this jump is the most important secondary jump from the point of view of the calendar and liturgy. What this jump allows is nothing less than moving any date exactly 1050 years ago, on exactly the same calendar date (day and month), exactly the same lunar phase, with the positions of the Sun and Moon with respect to the sky displaced by about 10º on average. Because its magnitude is very similar to that of the main jump, it was used for events related to it. This is the cause of the 1150-1050 confusion detected by New Chronology.

5. The chronicles duplicated by both the jump of 1050 years and that of 720 years, show between them the secondary jump of 1050 - 720 = 330 years.

6. The secondary jumps of 540 years (197235 Julian days ) and 1080 years (540 x 2) are the same , and it is also lunisolar . The adjustment of this jump is so perfect that it allows more than one iteration with hardly any displacement in the position of Sun and Moon. It therefore allows the same as the 1050-year jump (replicates the position of the Sun, Moon, day, month and lunar phase) but with the necessary number of iterations and with hardly any displacement (-540, -1080, -1620...)

Note: These time jumps, like the 1151-year cycle, are results of search algorithms on a database of astronomical positions generated for the purpose of this research. These positions have been calculated with the high-precision Skyfield library. The magnitudes of the jumps are not part of either the data or the algorithm and only appear as the best solution to the chronological conditions processed on the database.

This software has not yet been published, however the results offered can be verified with astronomical software such as Stellarium. In this case I recommend specifying the dates using Julian Day.

CJ Baiget
Ответить